Debates
- Martin Hägglund, “Marx, Hegel, and the Critique of Religion.” A Response to James G. Chappel, Peter E. Gordon, Stephen Batchelor, and Brandon M. Terry.
- Symposium on This Life
- Contributions by Benjamin Kunkel, Walter Benn Michaels, Jodi Dean, Michael W. Clune, Brandon M. Terry, and William Clare Roberts, and a response by Martin Hägglund.
- Martin Hägglund, “What is Democratic Socialism?”
- Part I: Reclaiming Freedom
- Part II: The Immanent Critique of Capitalism
- Part III: Life After Capitalism
- Special issue on This Life
- Frederick Neuhouser, “Spirit, Life, and Freedom: A Response to Hägglund’s This Life“
- Lea Ypi, “The Problem of Agency: A Response to Hägglund’s This Life“
- Jensen Suther, “The Philosophy of Our Future: A Response to Hägglund’s This Life“
- Martin Hägglund, “Why Mortality Makes Us Free“
- Robert Pippin, “Limited Time: On Martin Hägglund’s This Life“
- Martin Hägglund, “Being Hegelian Today: A Response to Robert Pippin“
- Related Reading: “The Revival of Hegelian Marxism: On Hägglund’s This Life“
- Michael Lazarus, “The Lives of Marx: Hägglund and Marx’s Philosophy after Pippin and Postone“
- Michael Clune, “Can We Imagine Timeless Experience?“
- Martin Hägglund, “Beauty That Must Die: A Response to Michael Clune“
- Michael Clune and Martin Hägglund, “Time in Our Time: Clune and Hägglund Debating at Stanford
- Special Issue, On Dying for Time
- Adrian Johnston, “The true Thing is the (w)hole: Freudian-Lacanian Psychoanalysis and Derridean Chronolibidinal Reading—Another Friendly Reply to Martin Hägglund“
- Jean-Michel Rabaté: “Dying from Immortality: Notes for a Discussion with Martin Hägglund“
- Martin Hägglund, “On Chronolibido: A Response to Rabaté and Johnston“
- Ernesto Laclau, “Is Radical Atheism a Good Name for Deconstruction?“
- Martin Hägglund, “Time, Desire, Politics: A Reply to Ernesto Laclau“
- Derek Attridge, “The Impossibility of Ethics,” also in Attridge’s Reading and Responsibility
- Martin Hägglund, “The Non-Ethical Opening of Ethics: A Response to Derek Attridge
- Special Issue, Living On: Of Martin Hägglund
- Michael Naas, “An Atheism that (Dieu merci!) Still Leaves Something to be Desired“
- Henry Staten, “Writing: Empirical, Transcendental, Ultratranscendental“
- Vicki Kirby, “Tracing Life: ‘La Vie La Mort“
- Aaron F. Hodges, “Martin Hägglund’s Speculative Materialism“
- Samir Haddad, “Language Remains“
- Adrian Johnston, “Life Terminable and Interminable: The Undead and the Afterlife of the Afterlife—A Friendly Disagreement with Martin Hägglund“
- William Egginton, “On Chronolibidinal Reading, Radical Atheism, and Impossible Desires“
- David E. Johnson, “Time: For Borges“
- Martin Hägglund, “The Challenge of Radical Atheism: A Response“.
- Brian Boyd, “Nabokov, Time, and Timelessness: A Reply to Martin Hägglund“
- Martin Hägglund, “Nabokov’s Afterlife: A Reply to Brian Boyd“
